At the end of the 4-year period, however, no new consultation projects could be completed within the framework. Thus, perhaps a few months after the conclusion of the pension service contract, it became clear that it was necessary to consider the life insurance pension plan as an advantage for the staff, then it would not be possible to use the same framework to appoint consultants for the development of a system. Basically, a framework makes it easier to manage the market testing process. Listings can often attract hundreds of bids, and buyers are required by law to review each bid submitted, so even simple listings can mean hundreds of hours of review for a buyer. By setting up a framework, buyers can test the market at regular intervals without having to review hundreds of complex quote responses. Just a quick question, is it possible to terminate a framework agreement prematurely? and if so, under what circumstances would tuPE not apply? HI It is countervailable if the Framework Agreement does not specify (a) the fact that the Mini-Contests may be used, (b) the Mini-Contest may be used in place of the direct recovery mechanism you specify, and (c) the manner in which they conduct the Mini-Comp as set out in the Framework Agreement. It`s likely that the frame specifies how direct selection should work (as you describe), but that doesn`t stop them from performing a mini-composition instead. There are many reasons to perform a mini-composition instead of using direct selection. I am afraid that we do not know of any list of framework agreements in progress. For the moment, the only solution I can propose, as you yourself say, is to visit each of the authorities, set the framework conditions and keep an eye on the authorities published in the Official Journal (ABLEU). If this is something that other people would appreciate, we will consider setting up such a list on Tenders Direct. I`m really confused about executives.
We had received a contract with the local authority, which was a four-year contract. At first, the work was good, then we realized that an external company had provided its services at a lower price, although it did not get the contract. Would it be fair to say that the local authority should have conducted a mini-tender to invite other people? We contacted the local authority about our concerns, and their response was that they had informed the managers that they had to follow the framework and use the excellent preferred company before any external company. This has never been the case and we feel like we have lost a great opportunity and money. Why would the authorities do that to us? We find that very unfair. We also noted that they do not have to comply with certain contractual obligations such as mandatory training of their employees, as we do. In addition, a discount, which must be reimbursed quarterly, does not apply to them. How can it be a fair trial? We feel like we are being discriminated against. We worked extremely hard to win the tender, and yet it seemed that we had better not have the contract.
The definition of a framework agreement is that it defines the conditions under which contracts are to be awarded, including the price. An obiter dictum (expression of opinion expressed in court or in a written judgment, but not essential for the decision and therefore legally binding as a precedent) of the judge in henry brothers no. 2 (§ 25) held that the prize should always be included as an award criterion when concluding a framework agreement and that the prize must therefore be determined within the framework itself. Amendments are governed by Regulation 72 and require the publication of a notice of amendment describing the amendments in detail. They also require that the original procurement documents contain clear and precise details of the permitted amendments. Unless the framework allows for changes to the terms and conditions, this is unlikely to be permitted. In the world of procurement, a framework agreement is a form of procurement that is used to create a “framework agreement” with suppliers. If the public service selects a supplier on the basis of the initial offers, it is not necessary to inform all executive providers that they are doing so, although this may have advantages in terms of transparency and future competitiveness. Of course, in case you conduct a mini-selection procedure or use the negotiated procedure, it makes sense to inform all executive suppliers that you are doing so in order to get a competitive response.
Different organizations are likely to have requirements that, while covered by the full functional specification, are different. Similarly, the preferred tariff base of a particular organization (c.B. annual subscription, perpetual license, etc.) may also vary and may not be expressly provided for in the Framework. It usually happens that the best known executives are the big ones set up by the OGC`s purchasing solutions or by groups of authorities acting together. This, in turn, means that the value and/or geographical scope of the requirement is much greater, which obviously plays on the strengths of a large company with a strong balance sheet and a national presence. We had already created a new company Ltd to provide the contracts and offered a new framework agreement on behalf of the new company and we were given a place in the framework agreement and received and signed a contract acting on professional advice, we put the original company ltd into liquidation and there remained a framework agreement that was secured on behalf of the new company ltd, it had already been accepted by the authority and we heard nothing more. Nowadays, it is common to define frameworks so that they can be used by a variety of organizations and not just by the organization that created the framework. Frames can also often overlap in terms of the products or services that can be purchased. It follows that it is important for any supplier to ensure that it is competing for a position in any framework that could become relevant, although it is not always easy to do so.
Two weeks ago, we received a message on the portal stating that the authority was reviewing our position within the framework and wanted us to stay there, they asked for the structure of the company and the certificates of the employees, all were sent and we did not hear anything more, after working for the authority for many years, I suspected that the work might be in the pipes and in the week we were asked to submit a bid for 2 mini competitions, We submitted our bids and waited for the result, the award date when it had passed, and we did not hear anything and suspected that we could have got one of the two mini competitions.. .
English
Português