No one in the audience knows the answers to either of these questions. There are several studies that could lead to answers – but those answers may or may not be accurate. Dealing with Russian plutocrats may well be shrouded in Russian secrecy. I asked a simple question about Quora that I thought could shed light on these questions, and I was told, quite harshly, that I thought I obviously had no idea about real estate development. What I asked was: What are the security, mortgages, and liens that public documents in New York show regarding Trump`s properties in New York? I`d still be curious to know, but I`m not in New York, so I`m not able to look at public documents myself. You know, with almost every real estate transaction that involves a loan and is supposed to be legally enforceable, there`s usually evidence of guilt. Let`s say one promissory note or several; or any other form of written agreement. And to secure the debt, you`d expect to find some form of security arrangement, such as a mortgage or locker agreement or some form of escrow agreement. And in order to concern third parties, the safeguards agreement should be registered in the public archives of most States, at least in the main locations where the subject matter of the security right is located. Hence my question – what do the public documents in New York, New Jersey and Florida show about security deals or interests affecting Trump`s real estate? Of course, there may be other methods to impose the payment of a debt, and since we may be dealing with a fairly approximate amount, these methods could also be quite crude. More like dealing with usurers, but on a larger scale.
Or the threat to reveal something the debtor may want to keep secret – a form of blackmail. I wonder about that possibility. Or since creditors are politically active and interconnected, there is another possibility for the debtor to consider a benefit other than payment: e.B. a lifting of sanctions or an intergovernmental agreement or a certain amount of looking the other way when the creditor does something. Or a business agreement where the debtor buys or lets the creditor buy something at a high price or sells something at a significant discount. With regard to the question of debt, any reasonable answer consists of two parts. Part One: Does Trump Personally Owe Money to Russian Creditors? Does the Trump Organization or any of its parties owe money to Russian creditors? Part Two: How much and what part of the Trump Organization, including its parts, belongs to the Russians? As the article attached to this published question indicates, in a development dubbed Trump, Trump received 18% of the equity for the use of his name. So who owns the remaining 82%? I doubt that Trump is personally committed to any debt to the Russians – as far as the legal execution of the debt is concerned. I certainly think the Trump Organization, or parts of it, are engaged in debt to Russian creditors. As mentioned earlier, the issue of legal enforcement of claims may not be the extent of Trump`s personal obligations to his Russian creditors – there are extra-legal methods of debt collection. For a broad group of creditors, such methods could include the abduction of the debtor or his or her family or bodily injury suffered by the debtor. For Trump`s Russian creditors, it may be helpful to keep an eye on the methods of recovery from organized crime usurers.
Trump may well be familiar with these methods, given his connection to Roy Cohn and Cohn`s clientele. As for the Russian creditors, I wonder about Deutsche Bank`s loans to the Trump Organization companies. Perhaps Deutsche Bank took note of the alleged disinterest of US banks in lending money to Trump and made a similar decision not to lend him their money. Perhaps deutsche Bank began funding Trump`s activities by acting as a broker or intermediary for strangers and Trump – receiving money from someone else to lend Trump that money. I`ve read articles about similar agreements where Part X is willing to lend money to Part Y, but doesn`t want that loan to be tied to Part X. Thus, Part X contacts a bank to manage the loan, create the loan documents and serve the loan as if it had been made by the bank, but Part X provides the bank with the financing of the loan. The documents for the loan or the documents that may be known about the loan seem as if the bank had granted the loan, but the bank did not put its own money at risk. That is, the loan documents, all the guarantee arrangements and the loan service would all give the impression that the transaction between Party Y and the bank had taken place. However, there would be another set of documents showing the relationship between the bank and Part X – but these would not appear in a normally discloseable form.
This raises the second part of the debt issues. What I notice about Trump Jr.`s remark about Russia`s overpresence in Trump`s capital structure is that it doesn`t refer to debt financing – so it could refer to participation in Russian capital. In a garden variety business, a stake (or participation) would be the ownership of common shares. I note that one example is Trump, who gets 18% of a company`s capital in exchange for the company`s brand as a Trump company. So I wonder who owns the remaining 82% of the capital. I wonder who the corporate records of the various companies in the Trump Organization show as stock owners, preferably or collectively. If these declared owners are other companies or corporations that are themselves fake companies or paper companies, this would indicate harmful activity. Keep in mind that Cohen structured the silent cash payment to Stormy Daniels with a shell company. Perhaps the directors of these fake units are Russians, who may not want their participation to be known, also or especially to other Russians.
by DA Whitman · Cited 25 — . apply this type of “lock-in” clause if the lender refuses to accept payment. 16. The increase may result in higher monthly payments or in the form of a file. The market buyers, Fannie Mae and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Here they have their business center: 3160 NW 1st Avenue Pompano Beach, Florida 33169 Tel 786 235 9026, but they don`t answer their phone, so you have to leave them a message. Contact with investors is listed as follows: Patrick Greenish, PresidentTel 786 235 [email protected] Statement in accordance with PinkLudwig Enterprises, Inc.`s basic disclosure guidelines. They connect generations of the trendy youth culture that forges new expressions of Americana to their grandparents, who are the guardians of the world`s great traditions.
These markets are largely excluded from today`s commercial broadcasters. Ludwig Enterprises is helping to bring analog radio into the digital age, harmonizing all ages and cultures while contributing to America`s rich treasure trove of diversity. Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. . . .
English
Português